Walk down the aisle of the supermarket and what do you see? Choices. More corn flakes, types of ice cream, and varieties of toilet paper than anyone needs. Yet it's there...choices. The reasons (and this isn't a marketing discussion) involve wanting to target and satisfy various preferences since not everyone eats whole wheat bread or wants shredded cheese. So why all the fighting about education? Listened to another discussion on MSNBC yesterday about public education. Education Nation is one of their signature features and I applaud them (and everyone) who places education at the top of the list. Yet what I seem to keep hearing is that public education is *the* way - that it's the only type of education that deserves our attention, funding, and resources. The hard work being done to turn the tide in our struggling public schools is no different than the work being done in charter or alternative schools. Each are working to meet the education needs of our children, albeit differently. So if "choice" defines our society, why is education any different? What makes public education better than any other education option and, as importantly, shouldn't the choices parents exercise in this regard receive equal attention - and respect - for the work they, too, are doing to educate our children?
I understand the premise of public education and indeed there are many districts, schools, and teachers doing a terrific job of educating our children in these settings. But just like soy products and scented detergent aren't right for everyone, the same applies to education. School isn't a one-size-fits-all issue and this certainly applies when we talk about, for example, the types of instruction and environment within which education occurs. Children have different learning styles and function better in certain settings when their individual needs are met. And in order to meet them, there have to be choices. Otherwise, it's the old "trying to fit a square peg in a round hole" adage still at work.
There are kids who thrive in large public schools yet there are others who find success in smaller charter schools. There are parents who choose religious education for their children and others who would opt for private school if provided with this option. Each option is worthy of our attention and support because if it was your child struggling in their current educational placement, wouldn't you want viable choices to evaluate? I know I did. The point is that today, education is not one thing but rather a spectrum of options. The days of school equating to all children attending their local public school are over. And thankfully so.
If the goal is to satisfy the need for our children to learn and if the reality is that every child learns differently, choice must be part of the discussion. And if the reality is that environment is a key factor to a child's ability to learn, then it follows that having choices vs. assuming that public school - or any option - is *the* answer is the only way. Thirty years ago, the choices available for parents in evaluating school options for their children were slim at best; today we have a range of options, making for a far richer "shopping" experience.
The bottom-line goal is to help ensure that every child has the opportunity to succeed in school. And because we define success differently for everyone, we must define education similarly as well. My support for education runs broad and deep in all its forms, yet I equally support the word that needs to follow it...choice.